The Implementation of Text-Based Approach within the School Based Curriculum in Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v5i1.944Keywords:
Text-Based Approach, Critical Thinking Skill, Junior High School CurriculumAbstract
The text-based approach has garnered significant attention for its potential to enhance literacy and critical thinking skills. This methodology emphasizes the use of texts as of education, innovative teaching methodologies are crucial for cultivating comprehensive learning central tools for learning across various subjects, aligning with pedagogical goals of fostering deeper comprehension, analytical abilities, and effective communication. Implementing a text-based approach within a junior high school curriculum presents a unique opportunity to engage students meaningfully, preparing them for the complex literacy demands of the modern world. This paper explores the rationale, implementation strategies, and potential outcomes of incorporating a text-based approach in junior high school education. Supported by expert opinions and research findings, the study highlights the efficacy of this approach in promoting higher-order thinking skills and academic success. By focusing on texts, students can develop a nuanced understanding of subjects, enhance their analytical skills, and improve their communication abilities, which are essential for their future academic and professional endeavors.
References
critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley &Sons.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (2016). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Routledge.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Education Association. Education Reports, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Dept. RC, Washington, DC 20036-1183.
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement. Stenhouse publishers.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40-59.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). International Reading Association.
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587-597.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 53(2), 145- 161.
Sultan, N., Ahmad, S., & Khan, M. (2018). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills through Text-Based Instruction. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(5), 45-53.
Sultan, S., Rofiuddin, A., Nurhadi, N., & Priyatni, E. T. (2018). Development of mass media text-based instructional materials to improve critical reading skills of university students. Pedagogika/Pedagogy, 131(3), 26-47.
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & S.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard UniversityPress.
