Implementing a Text-Based Approach within the K-13 Curriculum in Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v5i1.937Keywords:
Need For A Text-Based Approach, Benefit Of Text-Based, Prepare StudentsAbstract
This article delves into the potential advantages of implementing a text based approach within K-13 curriculum in senior high school. It underscores the increasing importance of critical thinking and communication skills in today's educational landscape and argues that a text-based approach offers a promising avenue for enhancing the learning experience. By immersing students in a variety of texts, this method not only cultivates their communication skills but also fosters a deeper understanding of complex subjects through the analysis and interpretation of written materials. Students who actively engage with diverse texts and hone their analytical and critical thinking abilities are better prepared to meet the challenges of both the workforce and higher education. Furthermore, the article contends that by incorporating a text-based approach into the K–13 curriculum, senior high school students can be equipped with the necessary tools for future success. This approach not only empowers students to navigate academic and professional environments with confidence but also nurtures their intellectual growth and adaptability. Ultimately, the article advocates for the adoption of a text-based curriculum as a means of fostering holistic development and preparing students for the multifaceted demands of the 21st-century world.
References
Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (2016). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Routledge.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Education Association.
Education Reports, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Dept. RC, Washington, DC 20036-1183.
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement. Stenhouse publishers.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Kurikulum 2013: Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE- ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2, 1988. ASHE-ERIC Higher Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How Writing Shapes Thinking: A Study of Teaching and Learning. NCTE Research Report No. 22. National Council of
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. Equinox Publishing Ltd.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 53(2), 145- 161.
Sultan, N., Ahmad, S., & Khan, M. (2018). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills through Text-Based Instruction. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(5), 45-53.
Sultan, S., Rofiuddin, A., Nurhadi, N., & Priyatni, E. T. (2018). Development of mass media text-based instructional materials to improve critical reading skills of university students. Pedagogika/Pedagogy, 131(3), 26-47.
Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 21802222, $6.95 member, $8.95 nonmember)..
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & S.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press
