Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Permulaan Menggunakan Media Aplikasi Marbel Pada Anak Disabilitas Intelektual Ringan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v7i1.1987Keywords:
membaca permulaan, disabilitas intelektual ringan, aplikasi Marbel, penelitian tindakan kelasAbstract
This study aimed to improve early reading skills and to describe the learning process through the use of the Marbel application for students with mild intellectual disabilities. The study employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) and was conducted at SLB Negeri Simalungun. The research subjects were two fifth-grade students with mild intellectual disabilities, identified as SA and VL. Based on the initial assessment, students’ early reading skills were at a low level, with achievement percentages of 35% for SA and 30% for VL.The research was implemented in two cycles, each consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. The findings indicated a gradual improvement in the learning process. In Cycle I, students showed increased focus, interest, and ability to recognize letters and syllables, although intensive teacher guidance was still required. In Cycle II, the learning process became more effective, as indicated by higher student participation, increased independence, and improved reading fluency.
In terms of effectiveness, early reading skills improved to 78% for both students in Cycle I, and increased significantly in Cycle II, reaching 93% for SA and 90% for VL. The results demonstrate that the Marbel application is effective in improving both the learning process and early reading outcomes for students with mild intellectual disabilities.
References
Ahlgrim-delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Carolina, N. (2016). A Meta-Analysis on Teaching Mathematics to Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities. 74(4), 407–432.
Al-azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL ): A Content Analysis of Peer- Reviewed Journal Papers from 2012 to 2015. 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Arikunto, S. (2021). Penelitian tindakan kelas: Edisi revisi. Bumi Aksara.
Bates, E., Thal, D., Finlay, B., Clancy, B., Origins, P. D.-, & Int, N. S. F. (2013). Early Language Development and Its Neural Correlates. 22343(February 1970).
Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-delzell, L., & Algozzinexya, B. (2016). Exceptional Children. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200401
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2014). Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read : Evidence from the National Reading Panel ’ s Meta-Analysis. 71(3), 393–447.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1977). Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability.
Jenko, N., & Stopar, M. L. L. (2020). Reading Literacy of Students with Intellectual Disabilities at the End of the Systematic Literacy Development Period. 19, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh19-25040
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Ok, M. W., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Wook, M., Bryant, D. P., & Effects, B. R. B. (2019). Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Mathematics Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities : A Synthesis of the Research Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Mathematics the Research. 2835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2019.1579723
Pahleviannur, M. R., Mudrikah, S., Mulyono, H., Bano, V. O., Rizqi, M., Syahrul, M., Latif, N., Prihastari, E. B., & Aini, K. (2022). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Pradina Pustaka.
Schalock, Luckasson, T. (2021). Ongoing transformation in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: Taking action for future progress.4 Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(5), 380-391. June, 380–391.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60(December 2019), 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Sgier, L. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis. 1–7.
Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. 450. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M., Smith, B. R., Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M., & Smith, B. R. (2011). Developmental Disabilities. September. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511421634
Ummah, M. S. (2019). BUKU METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
Wininger, S. R., Redifer, J. L., Norman, A. D., & Ryle, M. K. (2019). Prevalence of Learning Styles in Educational Psychology and Introduction to Education Textbooks : A Content Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719830301
Yilmaz, K. (2019). Constructivist Suggestions Constructivism: Its Theoretical Underpinnings, Variations, and Implications for Classroom Instruction.







