An Analysis Of Metaphors On Natural Advertisement

Fratiwi Juita Rajagukguk; Usman Sidabutar; Fenty Debora Napitupulu

doi:10.55583/jkip.v5i3.1082

Authors

Fratiwi Juita Rajagukguk Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Usman Sidabutar Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Fenty Debora Napitupulu Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v5i3.1082

Keywords:

Metaphors;natural_advertisements.

Abstract

This thesis discusses the analysis of metaphors contained on natural advertisements. The purpose of this research is to classify the types of metaphors contained on natural advertisements and find the most dominant metaphor on the advertisements. This research was conducted using qualitative method. The author reads and understands the contents of the advertisements that consist of 10 advertisements to obtain data. The data collection instrument is observation. The data is obtained from advertisement whose topics are about nature. The author found 114 data on natural advertisements. The types of metaphors contained on natural advertisements are representatives consisting of concretive metaphor 64 data, animistic metaphor 2 data, humanizing metaphor 45 data, and synaesthetic metaphor 3 data. From the research, the author concludes that concretive metaphor is the most dominant and frequently used in natural advertisements. The benefits of this research for the state and nation, especially for students and English teachers are that this research can be used as a source of teaching material, a source of students in learning more about metaphor, and for further authors, especially in linguistic that analyze one-way objects such as advertisements, art like poems, drama, and songs.

References

Ambar, Lukitaningsih. (2013). “Iklan Yang Efektif Sebagai Strategi Komunikasi Pemasaran Ambar Lukitaningsih Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 13(2):116–29.

Arumsari, Rizki Yantami., & Jiwa Utama. (2018). “Kajian Pendekatan Visual Iklan Pada Instagram.” Jurnal Bahasa Rupa, 2(1):52–58. doi: 10.31598/bahasarupa.v2i1.230.

Baceviciene, Migle., & Rasa Jankauskiene. (2022). “The Mediating Effect of Nature Restorativeness, Stress Level, and Nature Connectedness in the Association between Nature Exposure and Quality of Life.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042098.

Bans-Akutey, Anita., & Benjamin Makimilua Tiimub. (2021). “Triangulation in Research.” Academia Letters (October). doi: 10.20935/al3392.

Bimbingan, Bidang, & D. A. N. Konseling. (2016). “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Bidang Bimbingan Dan Konseling.” Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 2(2).

Dewi, Ni Made Ayu Juliana., I. Nyoman Tri Ediwan., & I. Made Suastra. (2020). “Language Style in Romantic Movies.” Humanis, 24(2):109. doi: 10.24843/jh.2020.v24.i02.p01.

Franco, Lara S., Danielle F. Shanahan., & Richard A. Fuller. (2017). “A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More than Meets the Eye.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8). doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080864.

Gibbs Jr, Raymond W., & Herbert L. 2006.835. Colston. “Figurative language.” Handbook psycholinguistics. Academic Press.

Hackley, Chris. (2005). “Advertising and Promotion.” Encyclopedia of International Media and Communications, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/B0-12-387670-2/00002-9.

Hales, D., Peersman, G., Rugg, D., & Kiwango, E. (2010). An Introduction to Triangulation. UNAIDS. Retrieved August 21, 2020 from https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/ files/sub_landing/files/10_4-Intro-to-triangulation-MEF_0.pdf

Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. (2008). “Metaphors We Live By.Pdf.” 129.

Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson, & U. C. Berkeley. (1980). “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8):453–86.

Leech, G.N. (1984). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. New York: Longlam Group Ltd.

Miles, Matthew B.; Huberman, A. Michael & Saldana, Johnny (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Muhammad, Hanif, & Razzaq Athar. (2022). “Annals of Human and Social Sciences.” Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 3(3):1–11.

Muhson, A. (2006). “Teknik Analisis Kualitatif.” Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta 1–7.Silvia Yurnianti1, Ermanto2, Zulfahdli. n.d. “42 Gaya Bahasa Iklan Produk Pt. Unilever Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Semantik Dan Pragmatik.”

Pardede, Monika, Christina Natalina Saragi, & Usman Sidabutar. (2023). “Jurnal Scientia Is Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) Metaphor Analysis In Songs Lyrics Of Charlie Puth: A Case On Semantics.” Jurnal Scientia, 12(4):2023.

Rahmadhanti, Rafika Wahyu., Bernadtua Simanjuntak., and Jumalintong Sihombing. (2022). “Metaphor Analysis and Meaning of the Song ‘Different World.’” FORDETAK: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan: Inovasi Pendidikan DI Era Society 5.0, 586–96.

Rijali, Ahmad. (2018). “Analisis Data Kualitatif Ahmad Rijali UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.” 17(33):81–95.

Rina Devianty. (2017). “Bahasa Sebagai Cermin Kebudayaan.” Jurnal Tarbiyah, 24(2):226–45.

Rowe, Bruce M., & Diane P. Levine. (2018). “Semantics: The Study of Meaning.” A Concise Introduction to Linguistics, 140–66.

Saskara, I Putu Adi. (2021). Buku Ajar: Media Periklanan Berbasis Implementasi Tuorial Praktek (Dasar, Penggunaan dan Pembuatan Iklan), Bali: Swasta Nulus.

Sidabutar, Usman., and Mulyadi. (2023). “Kajian Metafora Dan Metonimi Pada Iklan Gudang Garam ‘Nyalakan Merahmu.’” Jurnal Konfiks, 10(1):24–33. doi: 10.26618/konfiks.v10i1.10789.

Simatupang, Echa F. E., I. Gusti Agung Sri Rwa Jayantini., & I. Wayan Resen. (2023). “Figurative Language in Ariana Grande Song Lyrics.” Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 4(1):26–30. doi: 10.22334/traverse.v4i1.212.

Silvia Yurnianti1, Ermanto2, Zulfahdli. n.d. “42 Gaya Bahasa Iklan Produk Pt. Unilever Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Semantik Dan Pragmatik.”

Stowe, Kevin., Prasetya Ajie Utama., & Iryna Gurevych. (2022). “IMPLI: Investigating NLI Models’ Performance on Figurative Language.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1:5375–88. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.369.

Sugiyono. (2016). “Penerbit Pustaka Ramadhan, Bandung.” Analisis Data Kualitatif 180.Silvia Yurnianti1, Ermanto2, Zulfahdli. n.d. “42 Gaya Bahasa Iklan Produk Pt. Unilever Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Semantik Dan Pragmatik.”

Ulfa, Rafika. (2022). “Konsep Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Penelitian Pendidikan.” Al-Fathonah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 1(5):578–96.

Walisyah, Tengku. (2019). “Bentuk-Bentuk Komunikasi Visual Dalam Periklanan.” Jurnal Komunika Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Kajian Islam, 6(1):33. doi: 10.37064/jki.v6i1.5518.

Waruwu, Marinu. (2023). “Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method).” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1):2896–2910.

Xia, Mengzhu. (2021). “Analysis of Metaphor Translation from the Perspective of Relevance Theory—a Case Study of the Translation of Metaphor in Fortress Besieged.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(1):194–98. doi: 10.17507/jltr.1201.21.

Yurnianti, Silvia, Ermanto Ermanto., & Zulfadhli Zulfadhli. (2012). “Gaya Bahasa Iklan Produk Pt. Unilever Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Semantik Dan Pragmatik.” Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(1):42. doi: 10.24036/84780.

Yusuf, Munif. (2021). “Metafora Dan Metonimi Sebagai Pembentuk Polisemi.” Jurnal Pesona, 7(1):61–71. doi: 10.52657/jp.v7i1.1381.