ULTIMUM REMEDIUM AND THE LEGAL POLITICS OF TAX CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55583/jkih.v4i2.1700Keywords:
Criminal Tax Law, Integrative Justice, Restorative Justice, Legal CertaintyAbstract
The enforcement of tax criminal law in Indonesia faces a structural dilemma between the principle of ultimum remedium, which emphasizes the recovery of state financial losses, and the tendency to apply primum remedium, which is punitive. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a statutory, conceptual, case-based, and comparative approach to analyze the normative construction of the KUP Law, law enforcement practices, and Supreme Court jurisprudence related to tax crimes. The results show that the ambiguity of the discretionary formulation of Article 44B of the KUP Law, as well as the inconsistency of the ratio decidendi in court decisions, have given rise to legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of taxpayers. As a novelty, this article deconstructs the binary paradigm of ultimum remedium–primum remedium and proposes the Integrative Justice Model as an alternative theoretical framework. This model is designed as a legal triage mechanism that classifies tax crimes based on the level of seriousness of the act and the degree of culpability (mens rea) of the perpetrator, thus allowing for proportional differentiation of settlement paths through: (1) administrative-restorative paths, (2) hybrid restorative-punitive paths, and (3) punitive-preventive paths. The Integrative Justice Model is offered as a normative solution to bridge the interests of state financial restoration with just, effective, and legal certainty-oriented criminal law enforcement.
References
Ajeigbe, K. B., Ganda, F., & Enowkenwa, R. O. (2024). Impact of sustainable tax revenue and expenditure on the achievement of sustainable development goals in some selected African countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(10), 26287–26311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03730-y
Aksa, F. N., Widia, S. M., & Hanani, S. (2025). Perbandingan Metode Penelitian Yuridis Normatif Dan Yuridis Empiris: Penelitian Di Uin Sjech M Djamil Djambek. NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 12(6), 2226–2236. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v12i6.2025.2226-2236
Anggini, R., Irawan, T. S., Pratama, R. D., & Vientiany, D. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Ketentuan PPN dalam Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan (UU HPP). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 2(01), 1710–1719.
Arifuddin, Q., Riswan, R., HR, M. A., Bulkis, B., Latif, A., Salma, S., Hasnawati, H., Hidayat, A. A., & Indah, N. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Baselgia, E. (2023). The Compliance Effects of the Automatic Exchange of Information: Evidence from the Swiss Tax Amnesty. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04174690
Beetsma, R., Giuliodori, M., Walschot, M., & Wierts, P. (2013). Fifty years of fiscal planning and implementation in the Netherlands. European Journal of Political Economy, 31, 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.04.001
Feld, L. P., & Larsen, C. (2012). Self-perceptions, government policies and tax compliance in Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9196-6
Firmanto, T., Sufiarina, S., Reumi, F., & Saleh, I. N. S. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Panduan Komprehensif Penulisan Ilmiah Bidang Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Hidayat, Y. T., & Sinaga, H. D. (2022). Legal Reconstruction On Tax Invoices Not Based On Actual Transactions: The Legal Meaning Of The Ultimum Remedium Principle In Sustainability Of Taxpayer’s Business In Indonesia. Scientia Business Law Review (SBLR), 1(2), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.56282/sblr.v1i2.118
Istikomah, N. L., & Melati, S. R. (2024). Penerapan Asas Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Di Tingkat Banding. Jurnal Inovasi Hukum dan Kebijakan, 5(4). https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jihk/article/view/401
Jadidah, F. (2023). The principle of ultimum remedium in criminal tax matters. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 3(3), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v3i3.193
Januru, L., Milia, J., Yani, M. A., Utama, A. S., Damayanti, I., Ferdinanto, T., Umar, W., Prayudha, T. A., Abdurrachman, H., & Hamzah, I. F. (2025). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.
Kärner, M. (2022). Interplay between European Union criminal law and administrative sanctions: Constituent elements of transposing punitive administrative sanctions into national law. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 13(1), 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844221085918
Lacity, M. C., & Janson, M. A. (1994). Understanding Qualitative Data: A Framework of Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1994.11518043
Mpofu, F. Y. (2022). Green Taxes in Africa: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental Protection, Sustainability, and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 14(16), 10239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610239
Nolen, A., & Talbert, T. (2011). Qualitative Assertions as Prescriptive Statements. Educational Psychology Review, 23(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9159-6
Pasmawati, P. (2025). ASAS Ultimum Remidium Dalam Tindak Pidana Perpajakan. Lex LATA, 7(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v7i2.3812
Putra, I. M. W., Gunarto, M. P., & Hasan, D. (2022). Pemidanaan Wajib Pajak Atas Pelanggaran Kewajiban Perpajakan (Perspektif Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum Tata Cara Perpajakan). Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 11(1), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p14
Putra, I. M. W., & Yasa, P. G. A. S. (2024). Prospek Deferred Prosecution Agreement Untuk Preferensi Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Mengingat Karakteristik Administrative Penal Law Bidang Perpajakan. Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2(1), 203–240. https://doi.org/10.55292/y090b678
Retnani, D. S., Muna, K., Wardhani, P. K., & Martitah, M. (2024). Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Nasional dalam Eksekusi Pelaku Kejahatan Perpajakan: Suatu Tinjauan Filosofis. Bookchapter Hukum Dan Politik Dalam Berbagai Perspektif, 3, 292–327. https://doi.org/10.15294/hp.v3i1.211
Revkin, M. R., & Ahram, A. I. (2020). Perspectives on the rebel social contract: Exit, voice, and loyalty in the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. World Development, 132, 104981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104981
Silalahi, H. (2025). Harmonization of Tax Criminal Law Enforcement with the New Criminal Code (KUHP): A Restorative Justice Perspective. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 3(2), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v3i2.596
Sumarna, D., Ravena, D., Herniati, D. D., & Mulyana, A. (2022). Criminal Law Policy in Stopping Investigations in the Taxation. Journal La Sociale, 3(6), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v3i6.736
Ulinnuha, A. H. (2025). Peran Sinergis Antara Zakat Dan Pajak Sebagai Instrumen Utama Dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Sosial Keagamaan, 2(4), 773–780.
Viona, M., N, N., Katanging, D. G., & Pangestoeti, W. (2025). Hubungan Antara Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dan Penerimaan Negara: Perspektif Ekonomi Publik. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(11). https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/Socius/article/view/1938
Welkenhuysen, E. (2017). Beleidsanalyse van de maatregelen getroffen ter bevordering van de fiscale transparantie tussen Europese lidstaten. https://documentserver.uhasselt.be//handle/1942/24817
